Skip to main content

Situation
Problem
Solution
Results
Resources – Case study
Talk to SME

20+ years
of experience in
Patent
prosecution &
Claim Drafting

Streamlining IP Portfolio Integrity

21 Sep, 2023 3 min

Situation

A US based law firm with an IP portfolio of approximately 300 clients and approximately 1500 active US patent matters. During their business review, it was noted that 5% of matters required a CoC to be filed. This had incurred additional costs as well as goodwill of the firm​.

It was identified that most errors could have been easily rectified before the grant if reviewed in detail.

Problem

The primary reason for the error was determined to be a lack of attention to detail during allowance as a detailed review was not being conducted upon receipt of a notice of allowance from USPTO.

Solution

We offered to conduct a post-allowance review on all the matters that had an upcoming due date for issuing fee payments. 50 notice of allowance documents were reviewed, out of which 2 had errors. One matter had the incorrect claim numbers listed while priority information was missing in the other.

Results

The client signed a contract with us for conducting post-allowance reviews and another for IDS review, preparation, and filing.

Resources - Case Study

Connect with us

    Solutions Finder